The exact question, response, verdict, and failure pattern—not just an aggregate score.
Audit your AI. Know what failed, why, and what needs to change.
VeriTrooper tests real AI interactions against the approved material they are supposed to follow, records every finding, and delivers a verifiable evidence package another reviewer can inspect.
From approved source to reviewable audit record.
Establish the evidence. Test the interaction. Isolate the failure. Preserve the decision.
A record you can act on—and defend.
The approved source, rule, or expectation used to evaluate the interaction.
Evidence that helps the team locate problems in prompts, retrieval, policy, source data, or model behavior.
A repeatable run record that shows what changed when the corrected system is tested again.
Test the data. Audit the answers. Monitor what ships.

SitRep
Find duplicates, contradictions, stale versions, and structural weaknesses before an AI learns to repeat them.
Governance service includedExplore SitRep →
Scout
Audit any model or assistant against your sources and preserve every verdict, failure, and fix.
Governance service includedExplore Scout →
Watchtower
Capture or probe production answers, evaluate them on a cadence, and identify drift and recurring failures.
Governance service includedExplore Watchtower →Move from “the score is low” to “this is what needs correction.”
VeriTrooper does not stop at pass or fail. It ties each finding to the tested interaction and the evidence that governed it, so your team can decide what part of the AI system needs attention and prove whether the correction worked.
See how findings are produced →Preserve the question, answer, verdict, and observed failure
Identify the source or expectation the answer did not satisfy
Use the record to target prompts, retrieval, policy, data, or model behavior
Rerun the audit and preserve the new result beside the original
Turn test results into review-ready technical documentation.
VeriTrooper organizes measured accuracy, robustness, limitations, testing procedures, dated run records, and human signoff into evidence that supports Article 11 and Annex IV documentation.
- Annex IV testing and validation record
- System card, data card, and framework crosswalk
- Traceable findings, run configuration, and reviewer disposition
Carry each product's evidence through accountable review.
The shared governance service brings a Scout, SitRep, or Watchtower package together with system facts, legal classification, oversight measures, owners, remediation, and named human decisions. It is a service within the three products—not a fourth product—and it does not make legal determinations for the operator.
- Verified evidence-package intake from any core product
- Recorded classification, exception, and remediation decisions
- Named owner, reviewer, approver, legal entity, and review date
Measured improvement, preserved as evidence.
These results demonstrate a valuable consequence of the audit process—not its entire purpose. Each improvement is backed by a dated run record and inspectable methodology.
The model under test never gets the final say.
Clear-cut answers are settled with deterministic checks against verified ground truth. Contested cases can be routed to an independent model from a different vendor. A qualified human reviews the finished result and records signoff.
Read the assurance method →Questions and reference evidence from approved sources
Reproducible rules settle clear cases
Contested verdicts receive a separate opinion
A named reviewer accepts the scoped result
Designed for sensitive deployments.
VeriTrooper uploads nothing to VeriTrooper. Air-gapped work stays on-host. When you configure a cloud model, the application communicates directly with that provider under the boundary you approve.
Review security and deployment →Try all three audit products.
14 days from the first real audit, five shared runs, and up to 200 questions or evaluated interactions per run. The current installer is an unsigned pre-release.
Bring one important AI workflow.
One product, one use case, one approved source corpus, and up to 250 questions or monitored turns—ending in a verifiable package and executive readout.
